许多读者来信询问关于Migrating的相关问题。针对大家最为关心的几个焦点，本文特邀专家进行权威解读。
问：关于Migrating的核心要素，专家怎么看？ 答：Steven Skiena writes in The Algorithm Design Manual: “Reasonable-looking algorithms can easily be incorrect. Algorithm correctness is a property that must be carefully demonstrated.” It’s not enough that the code looks right. It’s not enough that the tests pass. You have to demonstrate with benchmarks and with proof that the system does what it should. 576,000 lines and no benchmark. That is not “correctness first, optimization later.” That is no correctness at all.
。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析
问：当前Migrating面临的主要挑战是什么？ 答：See the source code. ↩︎
据统计数据显示，相关领域的市场规模已达到了新的历史高点，年复合增长率保持在两位数水平。，更多细节参见PDF资料
问：Migrating未来的发展方向如何？ 答：fdatasync instead of fsync. Data-only sync wihtout metadata journaling saves measurable time per commit. The reimplementation uses sync_all() because it is the safe default.
问：普通人应该如何看待Migrating的变化？ 答：Today, in the year 2000, AMD shipped an undisputable processor milestone, its 1 GHz Athlon CPU. Thus, the Gigahertz PC era was born. AMD scored marketing gold ahead of its powerful rival Intel. PC industry heavy hitters of the time, Compaq and Gateway, were key partners, and the first pre-built 1 GHz system deliveries began the following week.，详情可参考新收录的资料
随着Migrating领域的不断深化发展，我们有理由相信，未来将涌现出更多创新成果和发展机遇。感谢您的阅读，欢迎持续关注后续报道。